Re: Benchmarking objrmap under memory pressure
From: Bill Davidsen
Date: Thu Apr 22 2004 - 15:01:50 EST
Hugh Dickins wrote:
On Thu, 15 Apr 2004, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Hugh Dickins wrote:
The worst that will happen with anonmm's mremap move, is that some
app might go slower and need more swap. Unlikely, but agreed possible.
It appears that users on small memory machines running kde are not of
concern to you. Unfortunately that describes a fair number of people,
not everyone has the big memory fast system. I will try to get some
reproducible numbers, but "consistently feels faster" is a reason to
keep running -aa even if I can't quantify it.
Appearances can be deceptive. Of course I care about users,
of small or large memory machines, running kde or not.
It appears that you do not understand that we're talking about a
case so rare that we've never seen it in practice, only by testing.
But perhaps we haven't looked out for it enough (no printk), I'd better
put something in to tell us when it does occur, thanks for the reminder.
If -aa consistently feels faster to you, great, go with it:
but I doubt it's because of this issue we're discussing!
I don't disagree on that, but it seems that KDE developers have put some
serious effort into making the software well-behaved, and unless there
is some measurable benefit from the code which negates the benefits of
that effort, it seems desirable to appreciate code code by letting it work.
I was more commenting on the good performance at the bottom end than
addressing the large machines. All the big machines I have are in the
overkill range, and finding small benefits doesn't do much with
production loads, so I can't contribute any useful info at that end.
--
-bill davidsen (davidsen@xxxxxxx)
"The secret to procrastination is to put things off until the
last possible moment - but no longer" -me
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/