Re: File system compression, not at the block layer

[Ben Greear]

Richard B. Johnson wrote:

> Actually not. You need a FIFO to cache your bits into buffers of bytes
> anyway. Depending upon the length of the FIFO, you can "rubber-band" a
> lot of rotational latency. When you are dealing with a lot of drives,
> you are never going to have all the write currents turn on at the same
> time anyway because they are (very) soft-sectored, i.e., block
> replacement, etc.

Wouldn't this pretty much guarantee worst-case latency scenario for reading, since
on average at least one of your 32 disks is going to require a full rotation
(and probably a seek) to find it's bit?

Ben

--
Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/