Re: Cache queue_congestion_on/off_threshold

[Jens Axboe]

On Tue, May 11 2004, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Jens Axboe wrote:
> >On Fri, May 07 2004, Chen, Kenneth W wrote:
> >
> >>>>>>Jens Axboe wrote on Friday, May 07, 2004 2:39 AM
> >>>
> >>>On Thu, May 06 2004, Chen, Kenneth W wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>(3) can we allocate request structure up front in __make_request?
> >>>>   For I/O that cannot be merged, the elevator code executes twice
> >>>>   in __make_request.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>Actually, with the good working batching we might get away with killing
> >>>freereq completely. Have you tested that (if not, could you?)
> >>
> >>Sorry, I'm clueless on "good working batching".  If you could please give
> >>me some pointers, I will definitely test it.
> >
> >
> >Something like this.
> >
> 
> While we're doing that can we drop the GFP_ATOMIC allocation
> completely?

Thought the same thing. But lets stick to single item tests first, then
we can kill that double allocation after.

-- 
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/