Re: [patch] really-ptrace-single-step

[Fabiano Ramos]

On Tue, 2004-05-11 at 14:38, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 11 May 2004, Fabiano Ramos wrote:
> 
> > It would not work against 2.6.5, since
> > 
> > do_syscall_trace()
> > 
> > makes the check
> > 
> > if (!test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE))
> > 		return;
> > 
> > Simply removing it would do?
> 
> No no. You need to OR it with the single-step. Try:
> 
> if (!test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE) && 
>     !test_thread_flag(TIF_SINGLESTEP))
> 	return;
> 
> 
> - Davide

Still not working. :(
Correct me if I am wrong: is TIF_SINGLESTEP asserted whenever a process
is being singlestepped? I do not see where it is done.

> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/