[2/2] correct use_mm()/unuse_mm() to use task_lock() to protect ->mm

[William Lee Irwin III]

Split off from suparna's patches:

Correct use_mm()/unuse_mm() to use task_lock() to protect task->mm.

Index: suparna-2.6.7-rc2/fs/aio.c
===================================================================
--- suparna-2.6.7-rc2.orig/fs/aio.c	2004-05-31 22:06:35.788770000 -0700
+++ suparna-2.6.7-rc2/fs/aio.c	2004-05-31 22:08:41.057727000 -0700
@@ -538,19 +538,25 @@
 
 static void use_mm(struct mm_struct *mm)
 {
-	struct mm_struct *active_mm = current->active_mm;
+	struct mm_struct *active_mm;
+
 	atomic_inc(&mm->mm_count);
+	task_lock(current);
+	active_mm = current->active_mm;
 	current->mm = mm;
 	if (mm != active_mm) {
 		current->active_mm = mm;
 		activate_mm(active_mm, mm);
 	}
+	task_unlock(current);
 	mmdrop(active_mm);
 }
 
 static void unuse_mm(struct mm_struct *mm)
 {
+	task_lock(current);
 	current->mm = NULL;
+	task_unlock(current);
 	/* active_mm is still 'mm' */
 	enter_lazy_tlb(mm, current);
 }
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/