Re: [RFC] Changing SysRq - show registers handling

From: Oliver Neukum
Date: Thu Jun 03 2004 - 02:46:58 EST

Next message: Sau Dan Lee: "Re: [PATCH] serio.c: dynamically control serio ports bindings via procfs (Was: [RFC/RFT] Raw access to serio ports)"
Previous message: Dmitry Torokhov: "Re: [PATCH] serio.c: dynamically control serio ports bindings via procfs (Was: [RFC/RFT] Raw access to serio ports)"
In reply to: Andrew Morton: "Re: [RFC] Changing SysRq - show registers handling"
Next in thread: Theodore Ts'o: "Re: [RFC] Changing SysRq - show registers handling"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Am Donnerstag, 3. Juni 2004 09:27 schrieb Dmitry Torokhov:
> I don't like the requirement of SysRq request processing being in hard
> interrupt handler - that excludes uinput-generated events and precludes
> moving keyboard handling to a tasklet for example.

SysRq should work even if bottom halfs don't.

Regards
Oliver

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Sau Dan Lee: "Re: [PATCH] serio.c: dynamically control serio ports bindings via procfs (Was: [RFC/RFT] Raw access to serio ports)"
Previous message: Dmitry Torokhov: "Re: [PATCH] serio.c: dynamically control serio ports bindings via procfs (Was: [RFC/RFT] Raw access to serio ports)"
In reply to: Andrew Morton: "Re: [RFC] Changing SysRq - show registers handling"
Next in thread: Theodore Ts'o: "Re: [RFC] Changing SysRq - show registers handling"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]