On Sat, 5 Jun 2004, Russell Leighton wrote:
I have a test program (see attached) that shows what looks like a bug in 2.6.5-1.358 (FedoraCore2)...and breaks my program :(
In summary, I am doing:
clone(run_thread, stack + sizeof(stack) -1,
CLONE_FS|CLONE_FILES|CLONE_VM|SIGCHLD, NULL))
According to the man page the child process should have its own pid as returned by getpid()...much like fork().
In 2.6 the child receives the parent's pid from getpid(), while 2.4 works as documented:
In 2.4 the test program does:
parent pid: 26647
clone returned pid: 26648
thread reported pid: 26648
In 2.6 the test program does:
parent pid: 16665
thread reported pid: 16665
clone returned pid: 16666
Hmm.. The above is the correct behaviour if you use CLONE_THREAD ("getpid()" will then return the _thread_ ID), but it shouldn't happen without that. And clearly you don't have it set.
And indeed, it doesn't happen for me on my system:
parent pid: 13552
thread reported pid: 13553
clone returned pid: 13553
so I wonder if either the Fedora libc always adds that CLONE_THREAD thing
to the clone() calls, or whether the FC2 kernel is buggy.
Arjan?
Linus