Re: [PATCH] cpumask 5/10 rewrite cpumask.h - single bitmap based implementation

[Anton Blanchard]

> aargh!  It's back!

Its stalking you.

> There's something about this patch which make me break out in hives.  Does
> it *really* need to be that complicated?

If we dont want maximum backwards compatibility we can get rid of the <
sizeof(long) bits.

> iirc, the last time I looked through this I was unable to convince myself
> that it was endianness-correct.  Is it?

Should be, but we could boot it on something 64bit little endian to prove
it.

Anton
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/