Re: [PATCH][2.6.7-rc3-mm1] perfctr cpumask cleanup

[William Lee Irwin III]

Mikael wrote:
>> Doesn't work because cpus_andnot() requires all three parameters
>> to be lvalues. ... CPU_MASK_NONE ...

On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 09:01:57AM -0700, Paul Jackson wrote:
> I think your other fix (also done by Bill Irwin), make the above possible:
>  #define CPU_MASK_NONE							\
> -{ {									\
> +((cpumask_t) { {							\

I've posted this at least twice, I think once in isolation for some
driver (MSI?) and once as part of the Alpha fixes.

Please get some cross-compilers together so we don't have every non-x86
arch exploding at once. Alpha vs. cpu_possible_map was horrendous.


-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/