Re: [PATCH] Autoregulate swappiness & inactivation

[Andrew Morton]

Con Kolivas <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  Ah what the heck. They can only be knocked back to where they already are.

hm.  You get an eGrump for sending two patchs in one email.  Surprisingly
nice numbers though.

How come vm_swappiness gets squared?  That's the mysterious "bias
downwards", yes?  What's the theory there?

Please define this new term "application pages"?

Those si_swapinfo() and si_meminfo() calls need to come out of there.

A diff against Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt will be needed sometime,
please.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/