Re: [PATCH 0/5] 2.6.7-mm6, fix CRC16 misnaming

[Thomas Sailer]

On Thu, 2004-07-08 at 15:10, David Weinehall wrote:

> Wouldn't it be better to keep the size here too?
> 
> CRC16-CCITT instead of just CRC-CCITT.

IMO not necessary, the size is clear from the return type, and CCITT
AFAIK never defined a 32bit CRC Poly

Tom

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/