Re: GCC 3.4 and broken inlining.

From: Andi Kleen
Date: Fri Jul 09 2004 - 05:12:46 EST

Next message: Rob Mueller: "Re: Processes stuck in unkillable D state (now seen in 2.6.7-mm6)"
Previous message: Manuel Arostegui Ramirez: "Re: Kernel fchown() exploit status?"
In reply to: Adrian Bunk: "[updated 2.6 patch] #define inline as __attribute__((always_inline)) also for gcc >= 3.4"
Next in thread: Robert Hancock: "Re: GCC 3.4 and broken inlining."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Michael Buesch <mbuesch@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> Do I miss something?

Yes. Take a look at arch/i386/Makefile

-Andi

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Rob Mueller: "Re: Processes stuck in unkillable D state (now seen in 2.6.7-mm6)"
Previous message: Manuel Arostegui Ramirez: "Re: Kernel fchown() exploit status?"
In reply to: Adrian Bunk: "[updated 2.6 patch] #define inline as __attribute__((always_inline)) also for gcc >= 3.4"
Next in thread: Robert Hancock: "Re: GCC 3.4 and broken inlining."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]