Re: Modular filesystem using drop_inode would need inode_lock

From: Christoph Hellwig
Date: Fri Jul 09 2004 - 17:09:25 EST


On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 02:43:32PM -0700, Luck, Tony wrote:
> This is mostly a logical inconsistency at the moment (since the
> only filesystem that has a "drop_inode" function defined in its
> super_operations is hugetlbfs, and it is unlikely to move out of

And btw, ->drop_inode usage in hugetlbfs is also a really bad idea,
it's duplicating large parts of fs/inode.c and is already missing
all kinds of updates.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/