Re: [announce] [patch] Voluntary Kernel Preemption Patch

[Ingo Molnar]

* Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> the other bad thing is that there is no  point for the sysctl [...]

 [snipped another 30 lines of rant]

> >  (Note to kernel patch reviewers: the split voluntary_resched type of
> >  APIs, the feature #ifdefs and runtime flags are temporary and were
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >  only introduced to enable easy benchmarking/comparisons. I'll split
     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >  this up into small pieces once there's testing feedback and actual
> >  audio users had their say!)

	Ingo

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/