Re: [announce] [patch] Voluntary Kernel Preemption Patch

[Ingo Molnar]

* Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > For all the
> >  other 200 might_sleep() points it doesnt matter much.
> 
> Sorry, but an additional 100 might_sleep()s is surely excessive for
> debugging purposes, and unneeded for latency purposes: all these sites
> are preemptible anyway.

nono, i mean the existing ones. (it's 116 not 200) There's no plan to
add another 100, you've seen all the ones we found to be necessary for
this.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/