Re: serious performance regression due to NX patch

[Matthew Wilcox]

On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 03:02:25AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Apropos of nothing much, CONFIG_X86 would be preferreed here, but x86_64
> defines that too.

IMO, x86-64 should stop defining CONFIG_X86.  It's far more common
to say "X86 && !X86_64" than it is to say X86.  How about defining
CONFIG_X86_COMMON and migrating usage of X86 to X86_COMMON?

-- 
"Next the statesmen will invent cheap lies, putting the blame upon 
the nation that is attacked, and every man will be glad of those
conscience-soothing falsities, and will diligently study them, and refuse
to examine any refutations of them; and thus he will by and by convince 
himself that the war is just, and will thank God for the better sleep 
he enjoys after this process of grotesque self-deception." -- Mark Twain
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/