Re: Preempt Threshold Measurements

[William Lee Irwin III]

On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 02:07:56PM +0300, Lenar L?hmus wrote:
> With all those little patches added and 2.6.8-rc1-ck5 I got this in
> my dmesg (preempt=0 voluntary=1 if it makes difference):
> bad: ld(3362) scheduling while atomic (1)!
> [<c02797ff>] schedule+0x43f/0x480
> [<c01161a3>] kmap_atomic+0x13/0x70
> [<c0117b5b>] __touch_preempt_timing+0xb/0x30
> [<c0146ef7>] shmem_file_write+0x2f7/0x320
> [<c014d890>] vfs_write+0xb0/0x100
> [<c014d978>] sys_write+0x38/0x60
> [<c0103ee1>] sysenter_past_esp+0x52/0x71
> bad: krootimage(3483) scheduling while atomic (1)!
> [<c02797ff>] schedule+0x43f/0x480
> [<c01161a3>] kmap_atomic+0x13/0x70
> [<c0117b5b>] __touch_preempt_timing+0xb/0x30
> [<c0146ef7>] shmem_file_write+0x2f7/0x320
> [<c014d890>] vfs_write+0xb0/0x100
> [<c014d978>] sys_write+0x38/0x60
> [<c0103ee1>] sysenter_past_esp+0x52/0x71

Amazing. I'll get a coherent patch out vs. 2.6.8-rc1 and so on.

-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/