Re: preempt-timing-2.6.8-rc1

[Joe Korty]

On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 07:40:28AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 05:28:05AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> >> This patch uses the preemption counter increments and decrements to time
> >> non-preemptible critical sections.
> >> This is an instrumentation patch intended to help determine the causes of
> >> scheduling latency related to long non-preemptible critical sections.
> >> Changes from 2.6.7-based patch:
> >> (1) fix unmap_vmas() check correctly this time
> >> (2) add touch_preempt_timing() to cond_resched_lock()
> >> (3) depend on preempt until it's worked out wtf goes wrong without it
> 
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 10:36:00AM -0400, Joe Korty wrote:
> > You preemption-block hold times will improve *enormously* if you move all
> > softirq processing down to the daemon (and possibly raise the daemon to
> > one of the higher SCHED_RR priorities, to compensate for softirq processing
> > no longer happening at interrupt level).
> 
> Plausible. Got a patch?

I can scrape one up.  It'll be a day or so.
Joe
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/