Re: XFS: how to NOT null files on fsck?
From: Chris Wedgwood
Date: Tue Jul 13 2004 - 17:58:04 EST
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 12:24:11AM +0200, Helge Hafting wrote:
> There is another solution - zero blocks when freeing them.
slow
> (Or put them on a list for later zeroing when the fs isn't busy, in
> order to kee??????p good performance)
complicated, doesn't buy as anything, it also means the blocks are
tied up whilst they are being zeroed (consider a truncated on a
multi-gb file, fairly common)
> With this approach you don't need to zero a half-written
> block after a crash, which means you destroy less data.
it doesn't zero after a crash, what happens is the blocks never make
it to disk and the metadata (which did make it to disk) reflects this
so read returns nulls
as is, you can truncate a multi-gb file, write over it and the only IO
you see will be the new data being written out, zeroing in between
would be horribly pianful
--cw
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/