Re: kconfig's file handling (was: XFS: how to NOT null files on fsck?)
From: Roy Butler
Date: Wed Jul 14 2004 - 01:29:17 EST
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 02:31:43PM +0200, Waldo Bastian wrote:
>
> The sentiment among filesystem developers seem to be that they don't
care if
> they trash files as long as the filesystem itself remains in a consistent
> state. This kind of dataloss is the result of that attitude, either go
> complain with them if it bothers you, or use a filesystem that does
it right.
>
Exactly. Don't blame KDE. Using XFS is equivalent to using
non-battery-backed NVRAM on an external disk array. Great if
performance is _the_ metric and lost results can easily be regenerated
(like in frame rendering). By example, if you create a file, write to
it, and then delete it fast enough, it will never hit the disk under XFS.
Roy Butler
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/