Re: [RFC] removal of sync in panic

[Lars Marowsky-Bree]

On 2004-07-14T17:45:46,
   Christian Borntraeger <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:

> I can imagine several changes but I am not sure if this is a problem which 
> must be fixed and which fix is the best.
> Here are my alternatives:
> 
> 1. remove sys_sync completely: syslogd and klogd use fsync. No need to help 
> them. Furthermore we have a severe problem which is worth a panic, so we 
> better dont do any I/O.

I've seen exactly the behaviour you describe and would be inclined to go
for this option too.

> 3. Add an 
>         if (doing_io())
>                 printk(KERN_EMERG "In I/O routine - not syncing\n");
> check like in_interrupt check. Unfortunately I have no clue how this can be 
> achieved and it looks quite ugly.

This would also work of course, but as you point out, it's more complex.


Sincerely,
    Lars Marowsky-Brée <lmb@xxxxxxx>

-- 
High Availability & Clustering	    \ ever tried. ever failed. no matter.
SUSE Labs, Research and Development | try again. fail again. fail better.
SUSE LINUX AG - A Novell company    \ 	-- Samuel Beckett

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/