Re: [PATCH][2.6.8-rc1-mm1] drivers/scsi/sg.c gcc341 inlining fix
From: Jeff Garzik
Date: Wed Jul 14 2004 - 18:42:38 EST
Andrew Morton wrote:
Yeah, but doing:
static inline foo(void);
bar()
{
...
foo();
}
static inline foo(void)
{
...
}
is pretty dumb too. I don't see any harm if this compiler feature/problem
pushes us to fix the above in the obvious way.
??? C does not require ordering of function _implementations_, except
for this gcc brokenness.
The above example allows one to do what one normally does with
non-inlines: order code to enhance readability, and the compiler will
Do The Right Thing and utilize it in the best way the CPU will function.
Just because you stick a modifier on a function doesn't mean it's time
to stop using C as it was meant to be used :)
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/