[PATCH] Re: check_mnt() breaks namespaces
From: viro
Date: Sun Jul 18 2004 - 16:30:17 EST
It's not check_mnt(), it's breakage in copy_namespace().
It forgets to switch new field (->mnt_namespace) in the vfsmounts
of new namespace.
--- ../RC8-rc2/fs/namespace.c Sun Jul 18 09:08:42 2004
+++ fs/namespace.c Sun Jul 18 17:23:15 2004
@@ -1037,6 +1037,7 @@
struct namespace *new_ns;
struct vfsmount *rootmnt = NULL, *pwdmnt = NULL, *altrootmnt = NULL;
struct fs_struct *fs = tsk->fs;
+ struct vfsmount *p, *q;
if (!namespace)
return 0;
@@ -1071,14 +1072,16 @@
list_add_tail(&new_ns->list, &new_ns->root->mnt_list);
spin_unlock(&vfsmount_lock);
- /* Second pass: switch the tsk->fs->* elements */
- if (fs) {
- struct vfsmount *p, *q;
- write_lock(&fs->lock);
-
- p = namespace->root;
- q = new_ns->root;
- while (p) {
+ /*
+ * Second pass: switch the tsk->fs->* elements and mark new vfsmounts
+ * as belonging to new namespace. We have already acquired a private
+ * fs_struct, so tsk->fs->lock is not needed.
+ */
+ p = namespace->root;
+ q = new_ns->root;
+ while (p) {
+ q->mnt_namespace = new_ns;
+ if (fs) {
if (p == fs->rootmnt) {
rootmnt = p;
fs->rootmnt = mntget(q);
@@ -1091,10 +1094,9 @@
altrootmnt = p;
fs->altrootmnt = mntget(q);
}
- p = next_mnt(p, namespace->root);
- q = next_mnt(q, new_ns->root);
}
- write_unlock(&fs->lock);
+ p = next_mnt(p, namespace->root);
+ q = next_mnt(q, new_ns->root);
}
up_write(&tsk->namespace->sem);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/