Re: [PATCH] Delete cryptoloop

[Paul Jackson]

Andrew suggested:
> printk("cryptoloop will be ... June 30, 2005 ...

Andreas asked:
> If EXPERIMENTAL isn't discuraging enough why not use BROKEN? 

Won't printk's will reach a wider proportion of the intended audience
than CONFIG variations?

And the specificity of the date-certain in the printk enables individual
planning and adaptive behaviour that the timelessness of CONFIG labels
can't touch.

Does your printk idea work for devfs as well, Andrew?

-- 
                          I won't rest till it's the best ...
                          Programmer, Linux Scalability
                          Paul Jackson <pj@xxxxxxx> 1.650.933.1373
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/