Re: [RFC] IDE/ATA/SATA controller hotplug

From: Greg KH
Date: Sun Jul 25 2004 - 18:37:09 EST


On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 02:47:39PM -0500, Doug Maxey wrote:
>
> Howdy!
>
> This note went out originally to a semi-internal list, but after
> several comments, posting it here...

Unfortunatly, it seems you didn't listen to those comments :(

> What I would like is input on the general strategy that should be
> taken to modify the controller/adapter and device stack to:
>
> 1) be first class modules, where all controllers/adapters are
> capable of being loaded and unloaded. This is directed mostly at
> IDE/Southbridge controller/adapter devices.
>
> 2) extend that support to all child devices; disk, optical,
> and tape.
>
> 3) be part of mainline.

Great, that all sounds wonderful.

> The items I perceive at the top of the issue list are:
>
> - The primary platforms for IDE/ATA devices are x86 based, and
> certainly do not care about having this capability.
>
> - Assuming the capability is added, what rework would be acceptable
> for block devices?

Enough to make it work :)

> - Where should this capability go? Fork a subset of IDE
> controllers, and put them under the arch specific dir?
> Or include all devices?

Not in a arch specific dir please. You all do that too much as it is...

> - should we work to the goal of having the capability for all
> platforms, and all IDE devices?

Yes.

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/