[PATCH] add core dump file name pattern option for cpu id
From: Josh Aas
Date: Tue Jul 27 2004 - 14:17:41 EST
On Thu, 2004-07-15 at 15:14, Joshua Aas wrote:
> Normally core dumps can be blamed on a program itself. However, core
> dumps can also be the result of faulty hardware. Tracking down what
CPU
> a failure occurred on usually requires that hardware be powered off
> piece by piece until no core dumps occur (on big machines this can
take
> a long time). Another option is to run the test pinned to each CPU
until
> the core dump occurs, but this can also take a long time on big
> machines. It would be very beneficial if the kernel was capable of
> making the CPU ID of the CPU the core dump occurred on available
> somehow. The following patch adds an option (%c) to the core dump file
> naming pattern convention for putting the CPU ID into core dump file
> names.
>
> Signed-off-by: Josh Aas <josha@xxxxxxx>
---------------------------------------------------------
--- a/fs/exec.c 2004-07-13 14:32:24.000000000 -0500
+++ b/fs/exec.c 2004-07-15 13:16:17.000000000 -0500
@@ -1276,6 +1276,14 @@ void format_corename(char *corename, con
goto out;
out_ptr += rc;
break;
+ /* cpu id */
+ case 'c':
+ rc = snprintf(out_ptr, out_end - out_ptr,
+ "%d", smp_processor_id());
+ if (rc > out_end - out_ptr)
+ goto out;
+ out_ptr += rc;
+ break;
default:
break;
}
---------------------------------------------------------
Is there any reason this couldn't be taken into the kernel? I didn't get
any response at all and it seems to be a safe and useful patch. Any
feedback would be appreciated.
Signed-off-by: Josh Aas <josha@xxxxxxx>
--
Josh Aas
Silicon Graphics, Inc. (SGI)
Linux System Software
651-683-3068
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/