Re: [patch] IRQ threads

[Lee Revell]

On Wed, 2004-07-28 at 17:15, Karim Yaghmour wrote:
> Lee Revell wrote:
> My real argument was best summarized in the second paragraph, and what
> I'm saying is that these approaches make the kernel's dynamic behavior
> extremely complicated. And while they do contribute to making the
> kernel's response time faster, they do not provided hard-rt, which is
> what everyone is trying to get in the end anyway (either intentionally
> or unintentionally.)
> 
> With that, let me respond to Bill's discussion on signle vs. N kernels
> as that thread is the most likely to be fruitfull. I hope you'll agree.
> 

Yes, agreed.  I am glad this did not escalate, and I hope you can
understand how I would have overlooked your actual argument due to my
perceiving the first paragraph as vaguely ad hominem. 

Lee

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/