Re: 2.6.8-rc2-mm1

[Johannes Stezenbach]

On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 11:44:23PM +0100, viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 12:24:55AM +0200, Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Johannes Stezenbach <js@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > --- linux-2.6.8-rc2/drivers/media/dvb/dvb-core/dvb_functions.c.orig	2004-07-29 00:19:50.000000000 +0200
> > +++ linux-2.6.8-rc2/drivers/media/dvb/dvb-core/dvb_functions.c	2004-07-29 00:20:05.000000000 +0200
> > @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ int dvb_usercopy(struct inode *inode, st
> >          /*  Copy arguments into temp kernel buffer  */
> >          switch (_IOC_DIR(cmd)) {
> >          case _IOC_NONE:
> > -                parg = NULL;
> > +                parg = (void *) arg;
> 
> Mind explaining why it is the right thing to do?  You are creating a kernel
> pointer out of value passed to you by userland and feed it to a function
> that expects a kernel pointer.  Which is an invitation for trouble - if
> it ends up dereferenced, we are screwed and won't notice that.

This is a hack introduced by someone years ago. The "pointer" is
actually an integer argument, e.g. in include/linux/dvb/audio.h:

#define AUDIO_SET_MUTE             _IO('o', 6)

actually takes an integer argument (!0 mute, 0 unmute), so one can write

	if (ioctl(fd, AUDIO_SET_MUTE, 1) == -1)
		perror("mute");

It is unusual (maybe even wrong?), but we cannot change it without
losing binary API compatibility. However, I see that sparse might
flag this as a possible bug :-(

Johannes
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/