Re: 2.6.8-rc2-mm1 link errors

[Matt Mackall]

On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 07:06:13PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-07-28 at 16:49, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Nope.   Could you take a look at the code in the top-level
> > Makefile which is doing this, work out why it broke?
> 
> It seems to come down to this warning:
> 
> arch/i386/kernel/irq.c
> {standard input}: Assembler messages:
> {standard input}:3565: Warning: setting incorrect section type for
> .bss.page_aligned
> 
> Which comes from this code in the 4k stacks code:
> 
> static char softirq_stack[NR_CPUS * THREAD_SIZE]  __attribute__((__aligned__(THREAD_SIZE), __section__(".bss.page_aligned")));
> static char hardirq_stack[NR_CPUS * THREAD_SIZE]  __attribute__((__aligned__(THREAD_SIZE), __section__(".bss.page_aligned")));
> 
> Removing the __section__() fixes it, as does moving to gcc 3.2 or 3.3,
> but gcc 2.95 and 3.0 still exhibit the problem.  It seems the 4k stack
> developers like newer compilers than I do :) 
> 
> The gcc 2.95 section declaration looks like this:
> 	.section        .bss.page_aligned,"aw",@progbits
> while the 3.1 section looks like this:
> 	.section        .bss.page_aligned,"aw",@nobits
> 
> It's definitely a bug that's been fixed:
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2002-10/msg00507.html
> 
> I've been told that I can fix it with a carefully crafted assembly file
> and maybe a change to the linker script, but all that it buys us is a
> little space in the uncompressed kernel image.  Plus, the warning will
> still be there at compile-time.  
> 
> I say, put them back in plain old BSS.  Patch attached.

Frankly, I'd rather have the warning if it isn't breaking anything.
Or how about I throw some version conditional magic at it?

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/