On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 03:30:11PM +1000, Anton Blanchard wrote:-
I think Anton pushed this to ameslab. I presume there should be some mechanism
for ameslab stuff to be included mainline. If there is such mechanism, then
I dont want to push the patch myself.
It looks good, could you send it directly to akpm, ccing me?
Andrew,
Patch below fixes a cpu_up race in PPC64. Please apply.
Signed-off-by : Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by : Anton Blanchard <anton@xxxxxxxxx>
---
linux-2.6.8-rc2-vatsa/arch/ppc64/kernel/smp.c | 10 +++++++++-
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -puN arch/ppc64/kernel/smp.c~ppc64_cpu_up_fix arch/ppc64/kernel/smp.c
--- linux-2.6.8-rc2/arch/ppc64/kernel/smp.c~ppc64_cpu_up_fix 2004-07-30 10:33:55.000000000 +0530
+++ linux-2.6.8-rc2-vatsa/arch/ppc64/kernel/smp.c 2004-07-30 10:34:02.000000000 +0530
@@ -927,7 +927,11 @@ int __devinit __cpu_up(unsigned int cpu)
if (smp_ops->give_timebase)
smp_ops->give_timebase();
- cpu_set(cpu, cpu_online_map);
+
+ /* Wait until cpu puts itself in the online map */
+ while (!cpu_online(cpu))
+ cpu_relax();
+
return 0;
}
@@ -963,6 +967,10 @@ int __devinit start_secondary(void *unus
#endif
#endif
+ spin_lock(&call_lock);
+ cpu_set(cpu, cpu_online_map);
+ spin_unlock(&call_lock);
+
local_irq_enable();
return cpu_idle(NULL);
_