Re: tcp_push_pending_frames() without TCP_CORK or TCP_NODELAY

[David S. Miller]

On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 15:02:33 -0700
"Robert White" <rwhite@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 4) Cork-then-uncork would still end up with two syscalls instead of one.

Syscalls are incredible cheap, this is not an argument for not
using cork'ing.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/