Re: drm - first steps towards 64-bit correctness..

[Eric Anholt]

On Sat, 2004-07-31 at 02:54, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Sat, 2004-07-31 at 11:32, Eric Anholt wrote:
> > As long as you don't use the linux-y
> > "u32"-type types, BSD should be happy with the changes.
> 
> can you explain why u32 would be outlawed? Surely it's trivial to do a
> typedef for u32 on BSD for drm ??

If there are nice standard types (uint32_t or u_int32_t, can't remember
which at the moment, I mentioned it in an email some time ago) out there
already that linux has too, why not use those?

-- 
Eric Anholt                                eta@xxxxxxxxxx          
http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/         anholt@xxxxxxxxxxx


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/