Re: [PATCH] [LSM] Rework LSM hooks

[James Morris]

On Tue, 10 Aug 2004, Chris Wright wrote:

> Thanks, James.  Since these are the only concrete numbers and they are
> in the noise, I see no compelling reason to change to unlikely().

There may be some way to make it ia64 specific.  Is it a cpu issue, or 
compiler?


- James
-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx>


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/