Re: Scheduler fairness problem on 2.6 series (Attn: Nick Piggin and others)

[William Lee Irwin III]

On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 07:21:43PM -0700, spaminos-ker@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> I am not very familiar with all the parameters, so I just kept the defaults
> Anything else I could try?
> Nicolas

No. It appeared that the SPA bits had sufficient fairness in them to
pass this test but apparently not quite enough.


-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/