Re: [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.8-rc3-O5

[Ingo Molnar]

* Lee Revell <rlrevell@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> There is definitely some subtle bug in the preempt-timing patch,
> because I am getting reports of long non-preemptible sections, which
> do not correspond to an xrun in jackd - if these were real then even a
> 400usec non-preemptible section would cause an xrun.  I do not seem to
> get many xruns during normal jackd operation.

could you send me these latest preempt-timing warnings?

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/