Re: [Linux-cluster] Re: [cgl_discussion] Re: [dcl_discussion] Clustersummit materials

[Lars Marowsky-Bree]

On 2004-08-11T11:46:03,
   Steven Dake <sdake@xxxxxxxxxx> said:

> If we can't live with the cluster services in userland (although I'm
> still not convinced), then atleast the group messaging protocol in the
> kernel could be based upon 20 years of research in group messaging and
> work properly under _all_ fault scenarios.

Right. Another important alternative maybe the Transis group
communication suite, which has been released as GPL/LGPL now.

This all just highlights that we need to think about communication some
more before we can tackle it sensibly, but of course I'll be glad if
someone proves me wrong and Just Does It ;-)


Sincerely,
    Lars Marowsky-Brée <lmb@xxxxxxx>

-- 
High Availability & Clustering	    \ I allow neither my experience
SUSE Labs, Research and Development | nor my cynicism to deter my
SUSE LINUX AG - A Novell company    \ optimistic outlook on life.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/