Re: Allow userspace do something special on overtemp

[Pavel Machek]

Hi!

> > > I think I'd rather see the calls to usermode deleted
> > > instead of extended -- unless there is a reason that
> > > the general event -> acpid method can't work.
> > 
> > See above, switching to acpid would break all the existing
> > setups... in stable series.
> 
> ah, the price of progress.
> 
> I'm confident that the distros can figure out how to
> update the (neglected) acpid scripts at the same time as
> (or before) the kernel update.

* not everyone is running distro

* people update their kernels more often then their distros

* not everyone wants to run acpid or equivalent (I don't, for example)

* it is still change in stable series.

* it is pretty subtle change, you are not going to notice it is broken
unless you actually run critical.

> If they can't, then ACPI critical shutdown will fail
> (maybe on some systems not such a bad thing;-)
> and TM1 will kick in, and if that doesn't work, TM2
> will kick in, and if that doesn't work the processor
> will disable itself.

hmm, yes, but it still would be nice to properly shutdown instead of
fail.
								Pavel

-- 
People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers...
...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/