Re: [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.8-rc3-O5

[Florian Schmidt]

On Thu, 12 Aug 2004 20:55:30 -0400
Lee Revell <rlrevell@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Even if it is not a long non-preemptible section, mlockall-test is
> still doing *something* that causes an xrun in jackd.  Maybe
> interrupts are being disabled for a long time.  Whatever it is, it
> cannot possibly be a jackd bug, because mlockall by an unrelated,
> normal-priority process causes an xrun in the SCHED_FIFO jackd
> process.

Hmm, yes, that makes sense. I wonder: does mlockall have any influence
on IPC?

Flo

-- 
Palimm Palimm!
http://affenbande.org/~tapas/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/