Re: [ckrm-tech] Re: [Lse-tech] [PATCH] cpusets - big numa cpu andmemory placement

[Paul Jackson]

Shailabh writes:
> But do let us know if there is interest in merging 
> (after this round of clarificatory emails is over) as it will affect 
> which way we go.

I remain convinced that such a merging would be wrong headed.

When I examine the experience that other operating systems such as
Solaris, Unicos and Irix have had with resource share groups and
cpusets, they have considered these to be two distinct facilities,
correctly so in my view.

So I recommend that you not try to bend CKRM to include cpusets.

Unless others have more to say, I too am content to close this thread
for now.  I've email-bombed enough mail boxes for one week ;).

I'll have an updated cpuset patch, hopefully next week, hopefully
with a shorter Cc list this time, with a couple of modest fixes.

Thank-you.

-- 
                          I won't rest till it's the best ...
                          Programmer, Linux Scalability
                          Paul Jackson <pj@xxxxxxx> 1.650.933.1373
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/