Re: [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.8.1-P0

[Lee Revell]

On Sun, 2004-08-15 at 22:58, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> if it doesnt change the xruns then it shows that it's not the locking of
> make_pages_present() that interacts with jackd, but it's what it does
> that interacts with it (or with the audio driver).
> 
> assuming the DMA-starvation theory isnt excluded via mlock-test2.c:

Sorry, you lost me here.  Does the behavior of mlock-test2 point to the
locking of make_pages_present interfering with jackd, or with the audio
driver?

Lee

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/