Re: 2.6.8.1-mm1 Tty problems?

[Paul Fulghum]

ismail dönmez wrote:

> On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 13:36:11 -0500, Paul Fulghum <paulkf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Even if a feature is not be enabled,
> > backing out a patch can verify it does not
> > touch code outside of the feature.
>
>
> Indeed backing up selinux-revalidate-access-to-controlling-tty.patch
> fixed "less" problem. But some other problems remain and the real
> issue is /dev/tty is a directory now! :
>
>
> cartman@southpark:~$ ls -al /dev/tty
> total 0
> drwxr-xr-x   2 root root     0 2004-08-18 00:52 ./
> drwxr-xr-x  15 root root     0 2004-08-17 21:53 ../
> crw-------   1 root root 3, 10 2004-08-18 00:52 s
> crw-------   1 root root 3,  0 2004-08-18 00:52 s0
> crw-------   1 root root 3,  1 2004-08-18 00:52 s1
> crw-------   1 root root 3,  2 2004-08-18 00:52 s2
> crw-------   1 root root 3,  3 2004-08-18 00:52 s3
> crw-------   1 root root 3,  4 2004-08-18 00:52 s4
> crw-------   1 root root 3,  5 2004-08-18 00:52 s5
> crw-------   1 root root 3,  6 2004-08-18 00:52 s6
> crw-------   1 root root 3,  7 2004-08-18 00:52 s7
> crw-------   1 root root 3,  8 2004-08-18 00:52 s8
> crw-------   1 root root 3,  9 2004-08-18 00:52 s9
>
>
> And this breaks many applications. Any idea why /dev/tty is a directory now?

Olaf, Greg:

The addition of pty devices to sysfs in bk-driver-core.patch
of 2.6.8.1-mm1 seems to be causing the problem described above.
See the rest of this thread for more details.

--
Paul Fulghum
paulkf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/