Re: [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.8.1-P1

[Thomas Charbonnel]

Ingo Molnar wrote :
> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > > Yes, Ingo identified an issue with copy_page_range, I don't think it's
> > > fixed yet.  See the voluntary-preempt-2.6.8.1-P0 thread.
> > 
> > right, it's not fixed yet. It's not a trivial critical section - we
> > are holding two locks and are mapping two atomic kmaps.
> 
> fortunately it's easier than i thought - neither the source pmd nor the
> target pmd can go away so we can simply drop the locks, reschedule, and
> remap. Does the patch below (ontop of -P3) fix the copy_page_range()
> latencies you are seeing?
> 
> 	Ingo
> 

Ooops, sorry about my previous post, I had missed this one. It fixes the
problem, thanks.

Thomas


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/