Re: kernbench on 512p

[Jesse Barnes]

On Thursday, August 19, 2004 7:38 pm, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > 41.4% 58.6%    0%  rcu_state
> > 61.3% 38.7%    0%    __rcu_process_callbacks+0x260
> > 41.4% 58.6%    0%    rcu_check_quiescent_state+0xf0
> >
> > So it looks like the dcache lock is the biggest problem on this system
> > with this load.  And although the rcu stuff has improved tremendously for
> > this system, it's still highly contended.
>
> Was this run using all of Manfred's RCU patches?  If not, it would be
> interesting to see what you get with full RCU_HUGE patchset.

So that stuff isn't in 2.6.8.1-mm1?  What I tested was pretty close to a stock 
version of that tree.  Where can I grab a version of that patchset that 
applies to a recent kernel?

Thanks,
Jesse
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/