RE: Entirely ignoring TCP and UDP checksum in kernel level

[Lee Revell]

On Sat, 2004-08-21 at 05:50, Josan Kadett wrote:
> Here is the very original linux-kernel mailing list, and if I cannot find an
> answer here, then nowhere on earth can this answer be found. I also saw some
> other messages regarding the same issue on the net. None of them is answered
> correctly; and also as if this is a very "forbidden" thing to disable the
> checksums, most replies are as if they are "unbreakable rules of god".
> Really, I am losing my patience with this. It is also very odd to write a
> low-level application in order to just disable a "feature" of the kernel to
> deal with a faulty piece of embedded firmware.
> 

Try this.  I have no idea whether it will work.  If it breaks you get to
keep both halves.

--- net/ipv4/tcp_input.c	2004-08-20 16:37:12.000000000 -0400
+++ net/ipv4/tcp_input.c-new	2004-08-21 04:56:51.000000000 -0400
@@ -4234,8 +4234,7 @@
 				}
 			}
 			if (!eaten) {
-				if (tcp_checksum_complete_user(sk, skb))
-					goto csum_error;
+				tcp_checksum_complete_user(sk, skb);
 
 				/* Predicted packet is in window by definition.
 				 * seq == rcv_nxt and rcv_wup <= rcv_nxt.
@@ -4291,7 +4290,7 @@
 
 slow_path:
 	if (len < (th->doff<<2) || tcp_checksum_complete_user(sk, skb))
-		goto csum_error;
+		;
 
 	/*
 	 * RFC1323: H1. Apply PAWS check first.

Lee

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/