Re: [PATCH] [2.4.28-pre1] more gcc3.4 inline fixes [2/10]

[O.Sezer]

> mxser_interrupt() is not inline, why are messing around with it?

it calls mxser_transmit_chars and if it's not moved after it
my gcc failed. (I admit the patches become messy if inlines
are simply not removed but I didn't want to do such changes
where possible).
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/