Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4
From: Pavel Machek
Date: Tue Aug 31 2004 - 16:04:43 EST
Hi!
> > It buys me caching.
>
> I'll actually buy into that. If only because I consider caching to be one
> of the more important things that the kernel does (caches are a _classic_
> case of "shared data that needs synchronization").
>
> However, that said, user space can trivially cache things in the
> filesystem, so while this may be a convenient feature, I think you should
> look at perhaps doing it in the _shell_ instead..
That cache should disappear as soon as I need disk
space. I.e. userspace should never see -ENOSPC because of this kind of
caching. This need some kernel support. Ouch and cached file should
atomically go away as soon as main file changes, otherwise I do not
see how multiple processes could cooperate on caching...
chattr +kill-this-file-when-low-on-disk-space patch.bz2...ubz
would solve first problem. Not sure how to do the second one.
Pavel
--
People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers...
...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/