Re: [Lse-tech] [PATCH] cpusets - big numa cpu and memory placement

[Peter Williams]

Hubertus Franke wrote:
> > be a possible solution.  Of course, this proposed modification 
> > wouldn't make any sense with less than 3 CPUs.
>
>
> Why ? It is even useful for 2 cpus.
> Currently cpumem sets do not enforce that there is not intersections 
> between siblings of a hierarchy.

There's only 3 non empty sets and only one of them can have a CPU 
removed from the set without becoming empty.  So the pain wouldn't be 
worth the gain.

Peter
--
Peter Williams                                   pwil3058@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious."
 -- Ambrose Bierce
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/