Re: [Lse-tech] [PATCH] cpusets - big numa cpu and memory placement

[Martin J. Bligh]

--On Monday, October 04, 2004 09:02:32 -0700 Paul Jackson <pj@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> Martin, quoting Andrew:
>> >> appropriately modified CKRM, and a suitable controller.
>> 
>> So not CKRM as-is ...
> 
> Yes - by now we all agree that CKRM as it is doesn't provide some things
> that cpusets provides (though of course CKRM provides much more that
> cpusets doesn't.)
> 
> Andrew would ask, if I am channeling him correctly, how about CKRM as it
> could be?  What would it take to modify CKRM so that it could subsume
> (embrace and replace) cpusets, meeting all the requirements that in the
> end we agreed were essential for cpusets to meet, rendering cpusets
> redundant and no longer needed?

Well, or just merge the two somehow into one cohesive system, I'd think.
One doesn't need to completely subsume the other ;-)

M.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/