Re: [PATCH] 2.6 SGI Altix I/O code reorganization

[Matthew Wilcox]

On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 12:10:08PM -0700, Grant Grundler wrote:
> > > Maybe rename pci_root_ops to "acpi_pci_ops" would make that clearer.
> > 
> > No.  Don't rename it to anything ACPI specific.  It isn't.
> 
> I understand raw_pci_ops is not ACPI specific.
> But pci_root_ops is only used by pci_acpi_scan_root().

Yes, but if we had other ways of discovering PCI root bridges on ia64,
we would use it there too.  It's exactly the same as the i386 code which
has 7 different ways to discover PCI root bridges.

-- 
"Next the statesmen will invent cheap lies, putting the blame upon 
the nation that is attacked, and every man will be glad of those
conscience-soothing falsities, and will diligently study them, and refuse
to examine any refutations of them; and thus he will by and by convince 
himself that the war is just, and will thank God for the better sleep 
he enjoys after this process of grotesque self-deception." -- Mark Twain
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/