Re: question on update_wall_time_one_tick() -- doh!

[Chris Friesen]

Friesen, Christopher [CAR:VC21:EXCH] wrote:

> Thus, doing an offset of +512000, immediately followed by an offset of 
> -512000, will leave you with a significant negative offset.
>
> Is this the desired behaviour?

Just realized this was the old adjtime() behaviour.  Wasn't clear from the 
adjtimex() man page.

Chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/